I mean, just in case you missed it. I'm working on editing the pictures from the celebration party, but I have this to share in the meantime. It's me after I was given the news that I passed!
 |
Couldn't help myself...
|
Good times, right?
For those of you who haven't heard the story, this is how it goes.
You enter into a room that no one else has arrived at yet apart from the person that doesn't live in the city. This means that your external examiner is the only person to arrive before you. It's a good idea to introduce yourself to minimize awkward silences. I mean, if you're into that sort of thing.
From there the remainder of your committee will trickle in as you try to set up the projector and what not. Of course it's up to the candidate to set up everything for themselves. While doing so, I had the distinct honour of being unable to pull down and keep down the projection blind. It was pretty awesome. I must have tried 10 times as the room slowly filled and people started making jokes about how this was the true test and I was failing. Yeah, that's great. I can't work a hanging blind. Very funny. Stupid blind. What did I do to it? I just wanted to move it to either all the way down or, later, all the way up when I was done with it. Was it so important that it hang there dangling halfway in between? Apparently it was. Apparently it needed to humiliate me. It was one of those kinds of blinds. After a great struggle and a near-swearing streak it finally stuck.
From there the rest of the committee trickled in and we got ready to begin. Introductions were made, and I was kicked out. (This is normal.) I was asked not to travel too far.
I wandered around the library watching all the students using the research computers to check Facebook. I noted a statue called Darwin's Chimpanzee. This statue and I became very well acquainted. I continued waiting. The top of the statue, I noted, was polished from where people had rubbed it's head - friendly little chimpanzee holding a human skull. I could imagine people rubbing his head and saying, "Hey little fella, whatcha got theREEEE!"
The door opened and the chair of my committee came out looking for me. I rushed back to the room.
My first task was to summarize my research over the past 5-and-some years in a 15 minute talk. Seems fair. The premise is to talk non-specifically about something you've spent entirely too much time being specific about. This is what it means to do a PhD. I think I fared rather well.
Although I had practiced my presentation a lot, I had not yet memorized it. Nor, do I think I could have given my nerves. I decided to hold onto my notes as there was no podium provided.
I kept my memory cues in front of me lest I flub up. I think it took about 3 sentences for me to flub.
In order to save time I had worked very carefully at selecting precise and succinct wording to describe the global problem that my research addressed. I got through a rehearsed sentence or two and then blanked. After a brief fumble, I referred back to the notes. I'm sure I'm the only one that noticed, but it was enough to get me into one of those strange meta-thinking moments where I was analyzing myself whilst talking and moving around.
Stop walking so much! Remember to speak s-l-o-w-l-y! Try to look at people... did I just say that right? Several slides passed without my noticing it.
Soon I was showing videos of my apparatus and things were sailing along; the rest fell into line. And
that's the practice effect.
Once the presentation was finished, the questioning began. Each of 5 committee members was given the opportunity to ask questions for 25 minutes. This, it turns out, is a very long time for you, while being desperately short for the committee member asking the questions. They regularly checked in with the chair to find out the amount of time they had left, shuffling through their notes as though these questions had just been revealed to them.
My external examiner was to lead things off. The first question came. I think she thought she was throwing me a softball. "Could you define the Equilibrium Hypothesis?"
...
......
............!!!!!
Uhm, no. No, I can't. Here's why. No one uses the equilibrium hypothesis. Well, except for this one dude. That's it. It's a widely discredited theory that receives no citations in any of the work that I am familiar with. So here's the trick: She and my super trained in the same lab. They also trained with the dude that came up with this ill-fated theory. Turns out My Super and this fellow (let's call him Dizzy because he lost his equilibrium) have a rather, *achem* terse relationship. They have well-known, shall we say, stances on each other. So yeah, okay, that's a fair assumption to make. Ask any student about their supervisor's favourite theories or their most hated theories. This seems fair. Most often students and supervisors have discussions while they are being trained about this sort of thing... most often.
I discerned that she was not given "the memo" about this dissertation.
I had to admit that all I knew was that it was discredited and that was that. I was pretty thrown! She eventually got to the point where she explained what it was. For you see, this was not really her question. What she really wanted to ask was how the theory that I put forth in my dissertation fundamentally differs in explaining behaviour than Dizzy's. Ooookay. Given my lack of familiarity with the theory, even after it was explained, I don't think I did a great job with this one...
Strike one.
Question two was a labrythine exposition on what sort of framework that I might be placing my current theory into.
I didn't follow her at all. After asking her to reframe the question several times and taking a stab, wrongly, at what I thought she was talking about she looked down and said under her breath, "internal model". Which in my field is like asking someone if they can tell their ass from their elbow. Apparently I cannot.
Annnnnd Strike two!
I must admit at this point, there was more than a slight concern that I wasn't going to pass this silly thing! I caught myself panicking and forced myself to take a deep breath and slow down.
At last a question came I could answer, and to be honest, I don't even know what it was. I just know I could answer it. From there things picked up and we started to have an actual back-and-forth conversation of sorts.
Perhaps the illusion of this conversation bolstered her spirits. She decided to take a stab at upping the ante again. I was doing a degree in Neuroscience and it was time to discuss the brain, however loosely.
I was asked, where I think the behaviour I describe is taking place. From my perspective, this was like asking where in Saskatchewan Canada is. Uh... Everywhere? I probed for more specifics and she offered a few as though I were missing the obvious. Thinking that we must be speaking globally, I offered what I viewed to be the key area involved in the behaviours we were discussing.
"No," was her answer.
Ah, we're having one of those conversations. I guessed at what is more commonly supported in the literature.
"Well not really," she corrected. I interjected with a further explanation and defense as I didn't really want to sound as though I was guessing (when really, I was guessing as to the question and not the answer). "Anywhere else?" she tried again.
"SPL?" I queried. The best way to answer a question is with another question.
Ah! She was pleased. Okay, we were there. She balked at asking me further questions but I urged her to. A concrete question followed about patients with damage to SPL and how that would affect performance. I was all over it. I think this helped tremendously.
Soon her questions time was over and we moved onto the next speaker. Thank goodness! From there things went much smoother. I understood the questions that were being asked, and was able to answer them well. Time ticked by. I did a
lot of talking. My coffee disappeared. I started on my water.
As the internal/external examiner (from another department at Queen's) began asking me her questions something amusing occurred to me. Part of the last round of questions was confusing because of the pomp. The pomp kept getting in the way of the clarity.
Here's how it works. Everyone acknowledges that this is a serious occasion and that they are the last bastions against idiocy invading the ivory tower. This is a very serious postion to uphold - sacred even. As such, everyone must demonstrate that they are worthy gatekeepers by demonstrating their knowledge as they ask their questions. This leads to some rather long exposition that somehow ends in a raised voice at the end as though it's a question. It would be quite entertaining if it didn't, you know, also mean that your degree hung on your ability to decipher these querying knowledge broadcasts.
We moved onto my internal examiner who teased me quite a lot. It turns out I have a propensity to use adjectives. While this seems to be beneficial in the rest of the world, adjectives are reviled in science. They are subjective. Subjective is bad. Adjectives are a science fail.
I suppose he has a point. We all had a good laugh at how a contextual misquote in my abstract, when read improperly, essentially nullified the entire career of the head of my department. I'm good like that.
Luckily this nullified researcher was next to question me. We all agreed that some editing was necessary before the final submission was given to grad studies.
The head of the department is a scientific dreamer. One of his favourite things to do is "blue sky". So that's what my questions from him entailed. What do you think, if given unlimited powers, you could...>insert hyperbole here That sort of thing. Everything was held to 30000 feet. It was a good time. I got to talk about video games and all the other research I'd done in the lab. It was entirely speculative.
My Super was last, and as he had promised the day before, asked me only questions that clarified answers I'd given to others. It was short and sweet.
It dawned on my while looking in his direction that all that coffee and water needed to go somewhere and after 2 hours, it had reached the end of its journey... mild panic began to build.
Following everyone's first questions, a second round was allowed. I like to call this the lightning round. The questions are fast and furious and the answers are often short and to the point. The lightning round flashed by. (clever eh?)
Following the questions, the chair reviewed to all that I was to leave the room while they discussed my defense. I mentioned that I was going to quickly run to the washroom.
The deliberators deliberated. I peed. I peed more than I have ever peed in my life. I peed so much that someone came in after I started, peed, finished, washed their hands, dried them with one of those air dryer things that takes forever, and then left again, and still I peed.
Not surprisingly when I finished my committee was wandering around the library looking for me.
I approached quickly, as everyone was standing. I could feel every part of me vibrating with anticipation. I knew it already that I was done, but seeing people standing confirmed it.
Given that I'd failed my comps, I knew the body language of failure. This was not it. People were not sitting, nor looking awkwardly at the table. I rushed to the finish line. My internal examiner waited for me by the door guarding my entrance. As I approached I saw My Super give me a thumbs up. I couldn't help myself, I loudly declared, "YAY!" as I entered the room.
My internal examiner tried to get out the mandatory, "Congratulations Dr. Bowman," but I'd ruined it. He joked with me, "I haven't even said anything, you don't know the answer yet!"
"Oh I knew already! I got a visual confirmation!"
From there many hands were shook and so on and then... I was finally done.
I was a doctor.
I am a doctor!